WHAT WOULD YOU DO?

Written by Graham Perry

Graham Perry M.A. Cantab FCIArb Experienced Arbitration Lawyer | China & Chinese Business Affairs | Public Speaker/Lecturer

20 March 2021

You are near the end of day 1 of an estate agent partnership dispute. 3 partners against 1. Is the only solution a split or is there a chance that the mediation can bring about a reconciliation?

Amongst the 3, 2 prefer a “get-back-together”. No 3 – who happens to be female wants blood on the carpet. On the other side, the single partner seems strong but you sense he has not thought through the problems of setting up on his own (becoming an employee again is not an option for him). You think there is some bravado + flakiness.

You sense a reconciliation might work but the main obstacle is the “blood on the carpet” partner. You have to address her problems. What is it? What happened? What was the trigger for her intransigence? You need to understand more about her agenda/grievance and it is up to you as the mediator to work out the best way to address it.

Think of how you would handle it? What would you do? How do you strip away the protective covering and get to the nub of the problem?

On Tuesday 23 March I will have more to say on this mediation but give it some thought in the meantime. Better if this process of ours is interactive.

Episode

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like…

EPISODE #3 – ADVOCATES AT WAR

EPISODE #3 – ADVOCATES AT WAR

GOOD MORNING FROM LONDON MEDIATION  - #325 EPISODE #2 – ADVOCATES AT WAR Episode 2 concluded;- But there are occasions...

EPISODE #2 – ADVOCATES AT WAR

EPISODE #2 – ADVOCATES AT WAR

GOOD MORNING FROM LONDON MEDIATION  - #324 EPISODE #2 – ADVOCATES AT WAR Episode 1 concluded;- “Dispute Resolution has...

EPISODE #1 – ADVOCATES AT WAR

EPISODE #1 – ADVOCATES AT WAR

GOOD MORNING FROM LONDON MEDIATION  - #323 EPISODE #1 – ADVOCATES AT WAR They happen – infrequently, not repeatedly,...