EPISODE #2 – ADVOCATES AT WAR
GOOD MORNING FROM LONDON
MEDIATION – #324
EPISODE #2 – ADVOCATES AT WAR
Episode 1 concluded;-
“Dispute Resolution has changed since the days when set piece confrontations were the norm. There is a reason and it lies in the improved and focused training of arbitrators and, in particular, of the Chair. Chairmen and Chairwomen are not now so naive or timid or cowed by the sometimes superior ways of the advocates.”
Episode 2 commences;-
Trouble in an Arbitration can be a long burning fuse or can come out of nowhere. The Chair needs to be prepared. His/Her concentration needs to be 100%. Never be lulled into a false sense of security by an atmosphere of calm and co-operation. Proceedings are in the main co-operative and not confrontational. Manners and civility are usually maintained. But the Chair can never assume that a discordant note will never arise. Hearings are a tussle. They are a fight – albeit often conducted with good manners but still a contest.
A misplaced word or a long sigh can be a prelude to an outbreak of hostilities – sometimes planned and intended and sometimes quite accidental. Either way, you the Chair, have to be alert, aware, with 100% concentration. You can never relax or lower your guard or move off centre. Your mind can never be allowed to wander. It does and you have to take a hold of yourself and return to total focus. You may have left home with instructions to send flowers to a distant relative or be very aware that one of your children is going to a big interview or be enjoying your football’s team big win at the weekend. Life is full of distractions and you would not be human if your mind did not wander – occasionally.
A Chair needs discipline, focus and commitment. You are a professional and you are being paid a good fee for your skills and abilities. Don’t let yourself down. You will – sometimes. It happens and your skill is to recover your mental composure without giving any impression that your mind has gone AWOL – Absence Without Leave.
Now to the task in hand. You sense that relations between the advocates are not the best. There is a little tension. Body language is very revealing so you do watch and observe and reflect. And you know that all is not well but when you come to act timing is everything. Intervene too quickly is “jumping the gun” and very much to be avoided because you will make matters worse. By the same token being slow to react is also an error because words will have been exchanged and the atmosphere will have dipped.
The focus is on you. Are you up to the task?
Here, you need instinct – awareness – and good choice. You pick up the vibes, listen to the words, look out for body language and the rustling of papers. As an advocate I knew things were going well when my opponent began to rustle his/her papers in an attempt to disrupt my focus. He/She trying to deflect the Tribunal away from the argument I was making. I would say nothing. Just slow down my presentation and, if necessary, come to a halt. It usually worked.
As a Chair your responsibility is different. You are there to ensure fair play with the minimum of disruption. If you sense a tactic is at work, allow it to go just a little too far and then step in with a kindly word. “We will pause to allow Mr/Ms X to put his/her papers in order”. Pleasant, aware, alert and effective. On with the show. A light touch is always preferred
But there are occasions when a more forthright approach is required. Firmness, clarity and most important of all – a sense of power. You are the Boss. You have to be in control. Sometimes a light touch works and the advocates get the message. But advocates can go too far and that is when you – the Chair – have to be clear and uncomplicated. Sometimes a reference to yellow and red cards can do the trick. Just letting the advocates know – with a touch of humour – who is in charge.
EPISODE 3. “WORDS THAT WORK AND WORDS THAT FAIL”
Episode
- AN ANXIOUS NEW ARBITRATOR
- AN ARBITRATOR STUMBLES
- ANGER MANAGEMENT
- ARBITRATION – FEES OF ARBITRATORS
- ARBITRATOR/MEDIATOR
- ARBITRATORS FEES AGAIN
- AWKWARD QUESTIONS
- BACK TO BASICS – A MATRIMONIAL MEDIATION
- DETERMINED NEUTRALITY
- DISCRETION
- DISPUTE RESOLUTION
- FAMILY TENSIONS
- FATHER’S LATE WILL
- FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS
- GENDER ISSUES AT SCHOOL
- HOUSING AFGHANISTAN REFUGEES
- LATE APPLICATION TO SUBMIT NEW EVIDENCE
- LENGTHY ORAL SUBMISSIONS
- MEDIATION - ANGER MANAGEMENT
- MEDIATION – DENTISTS DISAGREE
- NEIGHBOUR DISPUTES + SECOND HOMES
- NEW WORLD – NEW WORDS
- POST HEARING EVALUATION
- THE ARBITRATOR BECOMES A MEDIATOR
- THE BACKGROUND
- THE BIGGEST SOURCE OF MEDIATION
- THE CORE QUALITY
- THE DOMINATING SOLICITOR
- THE EXPERT WITNESS
- THE FAMILY PROPERTY DISPUTE
- THE FLEXIBILITY OF MEDIATION
- THE MEDIATORS’ SKILLS
- THE OVER-ACTIVE PARTY LAWYER
- THE STORY SO FAR
- TO INTERVENE OR NOT TO INTERVENE
- TRADE ARBITRATORS + LAWYER ARBITRATORS
- UKRAINIAN REFUGEES
- WORDS MATTER
- WRITERS’ BLOCK
Graham Perry On Dispute Resolution
This website serves a number of purposes.
First, it enables me to bring my skills and experience to a wider audience. I remain active as an arbitrator, a mediator, a party advacate and this website tells you about me.
Second, it fulfils a long-held desire to promote a forum for discussion of dispute resolution issues. I have for 20 years been the Chair of the Arbitration Lunch Club together with the Hon Secretary, David Barnett. Pre-Covid we would meet three times a year for a Lunch sponsored by a City of London Law Firm and at the Lunches we would hold a discussion of two topical dispute resolution issues sometimes with the participation of Judges Woolf, Rix, Coleman and Sumption. Covid has triggered the Club to go Zoom-wide with participants drawn from around the world.
Third, there is a current need for a lively inter-active website that, on a daily basis, enables dispute resolvers from around the world to participate in discussion, debate, and disagreement on issues affecting the conduct and development of arbitration and mediation. Contributions can be academic as well as practical; studious as well as flippant; argumentative as well as collegiate.
Why not read my articles on dispute resolution.?
Should you need any advice or require my services contact me today!
Goals
My goal is to make the website lively and encouraging to arbitrators and mediators; to put restraint and self-consciousness to one side and play their part in making dispute resolution lively, informative and progressive. We are always moving forward. Elsewhere on this site, you will find a page which tells you how to become involved.
SOMETHING UNUSUAL
Here’s an interesting situation.
You are a party-appointed arbitrator in a Tribunal of 3. The parties are buying and selling soya beans. They have a falling out over the terms of a Trade Agreement.
Sellers sues Buyer. The dispute is commercial and relates to the minimum quantities in monthly shipments over a 12 month period. A normal commercial dispute.
But then fireworks and Buyers send strongly worded letters to public bodies alleging that Sellers have committed fraud. Sellers argue that they have been libelled and add a claim for damages for libel to the claim about minimum quantities.
Does the Tribunal have to address the libel claim? Two arguments;-
1. The arbitrators are commercial people appointed for their commercial knowledge. They know nothing about libel. They refuse to adjudge the libel claim.
2. They have to handle the libel claim. It is a dispute. The parties want the arbitrators to decide the claim. The arbitrators have no choice. Deal with it.
This issue went to the courts and the Commercial Court made a judgment. But let me throw this open for comment. How do you think the arbitrators should act. Let me hear from you and then I will let you know what the Court said.
Graham Perry.
A Family Mediation
You are a family mediator. You are approached jointly by a husband and wife for assistance in a matrimonial break up. There are two children of the marriage – a boy aged 12 and a girl aged 14. They are both represented by separate solicitors.
The mediation proceeds. A mediation agreement is signed. Letters are exchanged. Meetings take place. You become aware that there are personal issues between the parents concerning their relationship. They do not concern you as such because the divorce is proceeding and these personal issues do not impinge upon the issues in dispute which are to do with financial arrangements, holiday arrangements and involvement with schools. In due course, these matters are agreed and recorded in the Final Agreement which is signed by the husband, the wife and yourself. Your fee is paid.
Three years later your wife has passed away through illness and you are alone without children. In a social setting, you happen to meet up with the wife and a relationship commences. Out of the blue, you receive a letter from the former husband’s solicitors alleging non-disclosure by you of the relationship which, on their information, was current at the time of the mediation. Further, the letter refers to a lack of impartiality on your part and material non-disclosure of the relationship and indicates a claim for damages will follow.
What do you do?
About Me
Graham Perry qualified as a solicitor in 1973 after graduating from Churchill College, Cambridge where he studied History and Economics. He practised for nine years and then made a major career change to become Managing Director, of London Export, a UK company formed in 1953 to concentrate on trade and business with the Peoples’ Republic of China. Since 1990 Graham has been an international dispute resolver of commercial problems resolving commercial disputes.
Experienced Dispute Resolver
Commenced my career as a dispute resolver combining my legal skills and commercial experience. I am an active arbitrator and trade representative in London with the Grain and Feed Trade Association (GAFTA), the Federation of Oils, Seeds and Fats (FOSFA), the London Metal Exchange (LME) and, occasionally, with the Sugar Association. I have a growing practice in shipping disputes and sit on the arbitration committee of the LME and FOSFA. I am a frequent lecturer and writer on commodity arbitration and mediation, giving lectures in China, India, Ivory Coast, Bhutan and the United Kingdom. I am an accredited CEDR mediator.